Direct Edge Protocols Implementation Guide Workgroup Call for Consensus: Direct Edge Protocols Implementation Guide v1.1


Consensus is closed as of 06/25/2014 5pm ET.


The candidate draft of the Direct Edge Protocols IG is advanced to v1.1:

Consensus candidate: Implementation Guide for Direct Edge Protocols v1.1-DRAFT-2014062301


Consensus Process
Each organization may provide one vote or abstain from voting. When voting, please record your organization name, your own name as your organization's representative, and log your vote in the "Endorsement" column. Votes may be:
  • Yes
    • A yes vote does not necessarily mean the deliverable is ideal but that it is better to move forward than block it
    • Comments may be provided for consideration
  • No
    • A no vote must be accompanied by comments that detail why the vote is no and what steps can be taken to address concerns
    • A no vote without comments is counted as an abstention

Workgroup Participants:









Organization Name
Organization Representative
Endorsement
(Yes or No)
Comments (If "No", what can be changed to make it "Yes"?)
Disposition
MaxMD
Bruce Schreiber
YES
We still need to address the XDM to non-XD recipient question.

GSI Health
Vincent Lewis
YES


EMR Direct
Luis Maas
YES


Cerner
Greg Meyer
YES


ICA Informatics
Ammar Elmubarak
YES


MEDITECH
Jonathan Brousseau
YES


Allscripts
Tom Foley
YES
agree that we still need to address the XDM to non-XD recipient question

MedAllies
James L Fisher
YES
May need more specific XML document examples to reduce implementation ambiguities