Documentation & Testing WG Call
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
2:00 PM EST

Lead: Janet Campbell (Epic)

Attendees: Arien Malec, Andy Oram (O'Reilly Media), Karen Witting (IBM)

Janet -
Let's spend most of our time working on the compliance statement.

Arien -
I have one other selfish need which is moving the applicability statement to IG consensus. That should be a priority for this group.

There are two terminology issues: one is the unfortunate acronym (ASSHT), the other is the term "Security Trust Agent" (STA). The object is that the word agent calls to mind the "Sean Nolan" notion of agent as a particular implementation model.

Janet -
I think the acronym is fine.

Arien -
I'll check in with John on the last go-around on the terminology. If I can get peace with John then I'll flip it over to Implementation Group Consensus unless there is objection.

Janet -
That sounds good.

As for the XD specs - it sounds like all of the issues have been addressed...

Arien -
Not all of the issues have been addressed. John needs to flip his vote, and I will not flip my vote until we get the threat assessment done. I may take that on myself.

Janet -
Does it need to go back for full consensus review or is it a matter of just the people with objections changing their votes.

Arien -
We need to follow the "Call for Consensus" process.

Janet -
Let's review the compliance document.

[There was lengthy discussion on this document. See the document for details -- comments were incorporated]