Company
Vote (Yes/No)
Comments
Allscripts
No
by Rich Elmore. Need to reserve for a possible change in prioritization with an extended implementation timeframe (plus some minor story edits) for "Patient Sends a Message to a Provider". Based on feedback from the Individual Involvement workgroup meeting on 4/29/2010.
American Academy of Family Physicians
Yes
by Steven Waldren
CareSpark
Yes
by Susan Torzewski
Cerner
Yes
by Andy Heeren
Clinical Groupware Collaborative


eClinicalWorks


Epic
Yes
by Peter DeVault
FEI.com
Yes
by Tony Calice
GE
Yes
by John Moehrke -- We should be careful to separate the transport requirements from the content and workflow requirements. The main difference in our use-cases is in content being communicated and workflow.
HLN Consulting, LLC


MedAllies


Medicity


MedPlus/Quest Diagnostics
Yes
by Steve Krsacok, Joannie McHugh
Oracle
No
Provider to Specialist "The referral reason is described in the message" In both the CCD and the CCR, the purpose is described within the document itself. Any text in the message should be on topics that are not included in sections in the CCR-CCD that are required for standard EHR documentation.
Oregon's Strategic Workgroup for the HIT Oversight Council


RedwoodMedNet
Yes
by Will Ross
Social Security Administration


SureScripts


VA


VisionShare
Yes